There have been lots of articles very worth reading in the last week or two and while there is much discussion about the demise of newspapers below are some examples of why we need them...
I watched the programme '18 Pregnant Schoolgirls' on the BBC, the documentary looking at events in Gloucester, Massachusetts, when an unusually large number of teenage girls turned up for pregnancy tests at the clinic of a school. Within hours the news of an alleged 'pregnancy pact' had travelled round the world, appearing in newspapers, TV bulletins and chat shows. Town officials denied the rumours. The documentary focused on the politics, but really most shocking was that the School Doctor and School Nurse felt that they had to resign after suggesting that they make condoms available. The town is 90% Catholic.
Sexual health education is a major issue in the US as you will know, with 'abstinence-only programmes' being widespread. Later this spring, Congress will have to decide whether to eliminate $176 million of funding for these programmes. According to Time, a workable compromise might be on hand in the form of comprehensive programmes which discourage early sexual activity, but the war is far from over...
"There is growing evidence that comprehensive sexuality programs like the ones Jordan teaches can be more effective than abstinence-only curriculums at persuading teens to behave more responsibly. Douglas Kirby, a neutral analyst who has studied sex-education programs for more than three decades, says most evaluations of abstinence-only programs have found "no impact on sexual behavior." However, nearly half the comprehensive programs that have been studied reduced sexual risk in three areas: delaying the age at which teens first have sex, reducing the number of sexual partners they have and increasing their use of condoms."
In the UK last week the Daily Mail accused pro-choice campaigners of highjacking the abortion debate - with corresponding mug shots. In response Simon Blake, Chief Exec of Brook, writes on his blog:
"Critics of me and my colleagues point to the increased abortion rate as evidence that we have got it wrong and that all our efforts point to increased sexual activity amongst the young. In fact it tells us the opposite. There are young women who are getting pregnant who don't want to be. And therefore we must help young people feel empowered and confident to only have sex they choose, when they are mature enough to enjoy and take responsibility for their sexual choices. We must also ensure there are contraceptive services available and they are skilled to access them. Then we will see a decrease in conception rates."
A C Grayling, wrote with passion on the 20th March about freedom of speech in particular regard to religion,
"At the United Nations Council on Human Rights in Geneva, the OIC [Organisation of the Islamic Conference] is trying again to have "defamation of religion" banned. The aim is a universal gag on free speech, blocking the right of anyone to criticise the too frequently negative effects of religion on individuals and society."
"But the HIV/Aids tragedy of Africa is only the tip of an iceberg. Opposition to control of family size in the poorest part of the world condemns women to endless pregnancies if they are not – as many are – killed or incapacitated by childbearing in difficult circumstances. The difficulty of looking after numerous children in abject poverty is, on its own, a grinding oppression, to say nothing of the immense barriers to the opportunity for decent lives later on for the children."
On the 23rd March Johann Hari wrote an article in the Independent about Jade Goody, highlighting how our collective treatment of Jade exposes some rather deep seated and unpleasant attitudes to social class. An honest and sometimes shockingly direct article, Hari non the less cannot fail to move the reader. It certainly increased the complexity of my own opinions.
"Her [Jade] mother was a seriously disabled drug addict, so Jade didn't go to school much because she stayed at home to look after her. From the age of five, she was in charge of doing the cooking and ironing and cleaning. ...Her father treated her even worse. Eventually, after periods in and out of prison, he was found dead from an overdose in the toilet of a Kentucky Fried Chicken."
"The cure for this youth-tormented terror is blindingly simple. Reclaim the old. Include them in our lives. The antibiotic for loneliness is company. I wouldn’t patronise the aged by claiming that everything they say is wise or steeped in the rare tincture of experience. They talk as much repetitive bollocks as the rest of us. But we never listen to them; we’re deaf to the old. We assume they have nothing to tell us, nothing but loopy non sequiturs and circular complaints."
"We should, at the very least, ensure that nobody, none of our kin, compatriots, kith or countrymen, ever sits alone wishing for their own death because they know of nobody who wishes them to live. We will abate our own fears of ageing by ensuring that someone else isn’t fearful and lonely. You get back what you give."
"However, there are many young people who want to make a go of their lives but are blocked at many turns and so give up. Blocked by an education system that narrows the definition of achievement because it is built around targets and testing, and staffed by creatively compromised and disempowered teachers. Blocked by a higher education system that is mostly riven with elitist and narrowly defined notions of academic competence. Blocked by a society that discriminates against youth and so reduces the participation of upcoming generations in the development of the social and cultural landscape."
The worst piece of editorial judgement in the last week has to be the Guardian's 'leak' of Jim Rose's proposed plans to incorporate some teaching on social media in his new curriculum. As Lloyd Shepherd, Head of Future Media Solutions at Channel 4 Television, described it Guardian Education Story FAIL:
"How does this help human understanding? How does this disingenuous attempt to grab some attention on the newsstand help children, teachers or parents? Why is a supposedly intellectual institution like the Guardian succumbing to sub-Daily Mail posturing? What on earth happened here?"
And so to finish this rather long post, I personally think that bloggers don't necessarily make good writers (but it is good to have so much commentary and discussion), that good writers should make good bloggers...... but thinkers should *always* be appreciated, and we are clearly so fortunate to have such good writers and thinkers. They are our National Treasures.
Recent Comments